Re: KEISLING: The moral and ethical decline of the Philadelphia Inquirer, Part 3
I have always been disturbed by the absence of physical evidence against Sandusky. Not a single victim testified that was not lawyered up and promised millions from PSU if they came up with a good story.
Fina is a crooked cop. He probably had something to do with the fraudulent presentment and associated strategic leaks. The janitor hoax (victim was likely his creation in order to incite the media and poison the jury pool (and bring in the inane idea of a malevolent football culture). He, along with Shubin, suborned perjury from victims 9 and 10, whose stories were ludicrous. The suborned perjury of victim 5 was not even believed by a jury who convicted Sandusky of 5 counts of abuse of a fictional victim! Victim 1 (Aaron Fisher) has been caught lying so many times that characterizing him as a pathological liar is appropriate.
Kathlene Kane promised to do a “no stone unturned” investigation of the Sandusky investigation, but limited her investigation to a small rubble pile in the midst of a boulder field. At a minimum, she should have addressed the fraudulent presentation and obvious evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. She left the Second Mile, DPW, and CYS alone.
Sandusky got access to children because DPW vetted him to adopt 5 children and at least 7 foster children, Second Mile gave him unescorted access to children as did Aaron Fisher’s High School. Kane did not address the failures (if any) which occured in these places.
