Lancaster blunders and missed opportunities in 2015

 

By Robert Field

Looking back on 2015, we are again reminded of how difficult, most times impossible, it has been to avoid tragedies and spur improvements in Lancaster.

 

Lancaster Public Library:   We thought this fourth try through commitment to a very significant grant would lead at long last to the expansion and renovation of the downtown Lancaster Public Library.   After much study, plans costing hundreds of thousands of dollars had had been finalized a half a dozen years ago. All that was necessary was a minor updating to take into consideration technological progress. It didn’t and we fear won’t happen. It isn’t for lack of funds. Rather it is like herding cats.

 

Lancaster Square East: Long into their third term in office (ten years), Mayor Rick Gray and his head planner Randy Patterson haven’t moved the project one jot. The Brunswick and its Annex could have been purchased for modest money and razed. The Bulova Building, long vacant and of zero economic value, has been in bankruptcy and is ripe for acquisition. The sale of the sites to developers of residential condominiums would have covered the costs of acquisitions. But Gray and Patterson refused a meeting to even discuss how this could be brought about. If herding cats was the obstacle with the library, ignorance and stubbornness when it comes to development issues on the part of Gray has thwarted important downtown development.   What progress that has taken place has been due to a national gentrification trend for young people and seniors to flock to downtown areas.

 

Lancaster’s Combination Sanitary and Storm Sewer System: Gray and Patterson were totally resistant to meaningful and incremental solutions to the problems that would serve the citizenry.   Instead they propose roof gardens and porous paving, sleighst of hand, not significant solutions. Sooner or later the Department of Environmental Protection will flex its muscles, and then city taxpayers will choke on the huge cost to prevent sewage discharge during storms  into the Conestoga River and downstream into the Chesapeake Bay.

 

Lancaster Downtown CRIZ Zone: The City Redevelopment Improvement Zone plan provides grants (actually gifts) to the Convention Center for renovation and to private interests for their projects. The theory is that the downtown Lancaster CRIZ Zone will benefit economically and produce extra taxes that can be used to pay off the grants. Fat chance!   We wrote articles explaining how these gifts today would have to be paid off by our children and grandchildren.   Just about everyone who is knowledgeable agreed but others were not willing to speak out.

 

Lancaster General Hospital: One moment it was a wholly owned community asset earning $150 million a year and worth $1.5 billion to $2 billion. The next it became part of the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Was it just to create an even bigger health monopoly to charge  insurance companies more and consequentially drive up insurance premiums? Or is it part of a bigger plan for the U of P System to offer its own health insurance and possibly bring down health care cost? No one knows because those in charge weren’t saying. And if any studies were made, they weren’t shared with the Lancaster public. No one knows.   No one seems to care. Think of what could have been done with the money had Lancaster General been sold rather than given away!

 

AMTRAK STATION: The initial parking plan as part of the station renovation actually reduced the number of spaces and would have caused passengers to walk much further had not NewsLanc and its publisher intervened with AMTRAK’S civil engineers.   Nevertheless, one cannot rely on finding parking spaces on a typical day. So train use which should be a major attraction for the region is choked.   This costs AMTRAK a lot of money and the Lancaster region a lot of opportunity. There is a solution close at hand, across the railroad tracks where the Days Inn used to be. A portion of the vacant site could be a parking garage with a bridge over the tracks to the second floor of the train station. Obvious? But who but NewsLanc is proposing it?

 

LNP:   Ownership is unwilling to promote the public interest when its financial interests in downtown real estate are in question. Despite NewsLanc’s urgings that LNP co-operate, they turned their backs on the Scott Martin plan that ultimately saved the Convention Center… at least for the time being. Sacrifices  were made by all of the other interested parties – bank, tourist bureau, city – but Marriott Hotel equitable owner Penn Square Partners (half LNP’s parent company and half a Dale High subsidiary) wouldn’t contribute a dime.   Now the long knives are out to obstruct Martin’s candidacy for the state senate.

 

Which all goes to the question of what really is the matter with Lancastrians, and in this we include the entire region.

Although many recognize the rip-offs and opportunities lost, those who could influence matters are obsessed with ‘getting along by going along.’ Far be it  for establishment  Lancastrians to offend anyone, let alone fellow members at the Hamilton Club or the Lancaster Country Club.

Despite our accomplishments on behalf of society outside the area with the sole exceptions of NewsLanc the  Lancaster Harm Reduction Project, over the course of 2015 we haven’t been able to accomplished much for the region.

But is hasn’t been for want of trying.

 

POST SCRIPT:  If you agree with much of the above, you can help by forwarding  https://newslanc.com/2016/01/01/lancaster-blunders-and-missed-opportunities-in-2015/ to ten local  friends.

Share

9 Comments

  1. LNP is a disgrace. As someone who has lived long enough to watch this publication change directions (countless times) I wonder how the original Steinman clan would feel about LNP’s complete loss of integrity?

    Your list is spot on. Our elected officials proudly boast their “rain gardens” and “bicycle studies” yet completely miss the opportunities and challenges we elect them to tackle.

    All but Scott Martin. As a very conservative voter, I have come to appreciate how Mr. Martin never backed down from controversy and did the right thing…..no matter what it cost him politically.

    As an outsider watching the senate straw polls unravel, it is sickening to see the republican committee turn against Mr. Martin because he angered their high roller donors. We the voters are with Mr. Martin. He has been the only elected official within the last decade that had any integrity or balls at all. The others ones gave good speeches….speeches most likely hand written by their donors.

  2. If we only had a real newspaper……instead, what we are stuck with is a self-serving, advertising-income conglomerate that could care less about public interests or public needs.

    This sorry excuse for a so-called newspaper will never challenge the Lancaster Elite (of which they are a part); will never challenge the status quo (of which they are a part) and will never admit to being a feeder at the public trough, which acts to the detriment of other more worthy and beneficial public needs.

    LNP/PSP needs to dissolve and stop holding Lancaster City/County hostage.

  3. The Lancaster Community-At-Large owes you for your activism and insight into the issues that are important, and that unfortunately cannot seem to be resolved without political inferences and biases.

    Undo influence breeds nothing but mediocrity in this community!

  4. This is spot on!

    Mayor J. Richard Gray’s self congratulatory boast six years ago that with him in office “Frankly the quality of life continues to improve!” is a myth.

  5. I wonder why the cost of LNP at Turkey Hill is now only .40 even though the price stated on the ‘newspaper’ is clearly .75????

    I’m glad for the savings…it ought to be free given the amount of advertising we are subjected to.

  6. Only for his rich friends with their fingers in the till! Minorities and the working poor be damned!

  7. Only thing that’s missing on the list is the millions they spent on the new water treatment plants only to have the one on the Conestoga start to fall apart as soon as it was put into operation

  8. “(Penn Medicine CEO Ralph) Muller said Penn Medicine is “hesitant to grow too quickly” and that for now, he’s against the idea of the organization owning and operating its own health insurance plan.” LNP reported July 20, 2015

    http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/university-of-pennsylvania-health-system-ceo-lancaster-s-as-far/article_114c5ebe-2f10-11e5-ad72-1bb8adfe179f.html

  9. This is truth. If the quality of life was “IMPROVING” then that would mean that the crime rate in the city would also be dropping… But anyone familiar with East End Ave and Ann St and New Dauphin and the area around there nknows that quality of life continues in a downward spiral. Often time city police won’t respond to the area unless they have significant back up due to the violence and other issues….

Comments are closed.