PENNLIVE: …In the typical life cycle of investigations, Duquesne University law professor Wes Oliver noted, a potentially climactic witness is interviewed late for the simple reason that investigators want as much knowledge as possible about the rest of the case to inform their questions.
Since Kane’s probe was born of questions she said she’d consistently received on the campaign trail in 2012 about the Sandusky case’s management, Corbett – who was sitting Attorney General when the office received the case in 2009 but already eyeing his 2010 gubernatorial run – is about as climactic as they come…
But unless the review’s scope has expanded, it seems less likely that it will go into the prosecutors’ inter-actions with former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who wrote the controversial report on university administrators’ role in the Sandusky case… (more)
EDITOR: Too bad. We suspect that the engagement of Freeh and subsequent preposterous settlement with the NCCCA were the final acts in the desperate attempts to avoid an investigation of Tom Corbett’s “slow walk” of the Sandusky investigation.
