In Hard Economy for All Ages, Older Isn’t Better … It’s Brutal

NEW YORK TIMES: …These Americans in their 50s and early 60s — those near retirement age who do not yet have access to Medicare and Social Security — have lost the most earnings power of any age group, with their household incomes 10 percent below what they made when the recovery began three years ago, according to Sentier Research, a data analysis company.

Their retirement savings and home values fell sharply at the worst possible time: just before they needed to cash out. They are supporting both aged parents and unemployed young-adult children, earning them the inauspicious nickname “Generation Squeeze.”

New research suggests that they may die sooner, because their health, income security and mental well-being were battered by recession at a crucial time in their lives. A recent study by economists at Wellesley College found that people who lost their jobs in the few years before becoming eligible for Social Security lost up to three years from their life expectancy, largely because they no longer had access to affordable health care…  (more)

EDITOR: Collateral damage resulting from legislation protecting people over 55  from being laid off acts as a disincentive for employers to hire individuals in their early fifties onward.   The same can be said for laws protecting minorities.   Like so many other laws protecting the rights of individuals, there is often some negative  trade off for the greater good.

Share