GOP officials in Lancaster and Dauphin counties hold their tongue and help to engineer Harrisburg bailout

by Bill Keisling

It’s something to see Republican Party officials in Pennsylvania turning their backs on free-market capitalism and supporting a government bailout of Harrisburg and its creditors.

The deal relies heavily on state subsidies involving the price of the incinerator, a ginned-up deal for parking spaces, lax environmental enforcement, and other ‘under-the-table’ payments to the capital city.

Today Harrisburg is at least $1.5 billion in debt, thanks to decades of wild spending and irresponsible bond underwriting by a former Democratic mayor.

The Republican-controlled Dauphin County commissioners, and the bond insurer, Assured Guaranty Municipal (AGM), became part of the problem when they risked their money to profit from earlier irresponsible Harrisburg bond underwriting. AGM had guaranteed performance by most if not all of the bonds that were sold.

But never mind that.

With a pat on the back from the governor, the Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority has talked itself and others in Lancaster County GOP circles into floating more than $130 million in bonds for a notoriously bad Harrisburg incinerator valued under $50 million, and buried in toxic waste.

It’s not so clear why. Some speculate that it has to do with the overweening ambition of its CEO to become the ‘trash czar’ of Central Pennsylvania.

If this same bailout had been put forth by former Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell, these GOP officials would be spitting blood and nails in vehement opposition.

“A loan long continued usually confers ownership,” goes an old Irish proverb.

If it goes through, the GOP will own the Harrisburg bailout, and all the economic and environmental fall out to come.

Share

1 Comment

  1. A Republican mayor, Republican state senator, and Republican-controlled County Commissioners created and forced through the single biggest corporate welfare giveaway in Lancaster County history: the downtown Lancaster hotel and convention center project.

    With operational losses nearly double what was predicted, along with the inability of the despised “hotel tax” to cover the project’s highly leveraged construction debt, this project will continue for decades to cost taxpayers many times over whatever benefits it might create for the community – all while the “private partners” enjoy substantial profits without paying local taxes.

Comments are closed.