From USA TODAY:
…On Thursday, a group of alumni and others with ties to Penn State issued a report critical of Freeh’s methods and conclusion, contending it included lack of disclosure, needed input by key witnesses who were not interviewed and a supposed lack of evidence to back up conclusions about senior university administrators.
The 57-page report by Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship said the university should have examined the role of state and local government officials and Sandusky’s charity, The Second Mile. It also said Freeh’s approach was incomplete and produced a “grossly flawed” report.
It said the criminal investigations and prosecutions related to Sandusky made it impossible for Freeh’s team to interview some critical figures…
Click here to read the full article.
EDITOR: Sadly, the critical report is mentioned far down into the article about the trustees meeting and it will be only one of many matters to be discussed.
