In its Oct. 10th lead article “Railroaded: Is trainyard relocation shutting out the public?”, the Post asks “Shouldn’t the [Public Involvement Plan] — on how the property is to be cleaned up – be completed, so that the public can review the plans? Or, better, shouldn’t the public’s input be considered before the plan is created, and then presented to the public as a ‘draft,’ pending input from the public after review of the plan?”
It also asks “Just how ‘public’ was this [June 17] ‘public meeting'” since F&M banned the Post personnel from “F&M soil”, “subject to arrest.”
WATCHDOG: There are also other important observations. The article may be the best yet by the Post. It can be viewed at www.LancasterPost.com.
