Justice Stevens: Risk of wrongful sentences higher

From USA TODAY:

Modern pressures on the judicial system have raised the chance a defendant could be wrongly sentenced to death, Supreme Court Justice  John Paul Stevens said Wednesday, explaining his changed view on the constitutionality of capital punishment.

“The risk of an incorrect decision has increased,” he told an audience of hundreds of lawyers and judges at a judicial conference here, responding to a question about his 2008 assertion that the death penalty should be abolished. He said that because of advances in DNA testing, which have led to the freeing of some innocent convicts, “we’re more aware of the risk than we might have been before.” …

Click here to read the full article.

Share

1 Comment

  1. In regard to the death penalty, retiring Justice Stevens’ states: “The risk of an incorrect decision has increased.”

    The opposite is true.

    1) We have fewer death penalty trials and fewer death penalties than ever.

    2) The due process and scientific protections, with the death penalty, are greater, now, than at any other time and than with any other sanction.

    3) The amount of time and resources put into pre trial, trial and appeals are greater with the death penalty than any other sanctions.

    To state the obvious: The risk to innocents has decreased. The reality is that innocents are more at risk without the death penalty.

    “The Death Penalty: More Protection for Innocents”
    http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/05/the-death-penalty-more-protection-for-innocents.aspx

    The 130 (now 138) death row “innocents” scam
    http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/03/04/fact-checking-issues-on-innocence-and-the-death-penalty.aspx

    “A Death Penalty Red Herring: The Inanity and Hypocrisy of Perfection”, Lester Jackson Ph.D.,
    http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=102909A

    “The Innocent Executed: Deception & Death Penalty Opponents”
    http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/10/08/the-innocent-executed-deception–death-penalty-opponents–draft.aspx

    25 recent studies finding for deterrence, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation,
    http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPDeterrence.htm

    “Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Reply to Radelet and Lacock”
    http://homicidesurvivors.com/2009/07/02/deterrence-and-the-death-penalty-a-reply-to-radelet-and-lacock.aspx

    “Death Penalty, Deterrence & Murder Rates: Let’s be clear”
    http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2009/03/death-penalty-deterrence-murder-rates.html

Comments are closed.