‘Presidential’ vs. ‘Political’ Trips: A Blurry Line, and Tricky Math

NEW YORK TIMES:   Facing 5,000 enthusiastic students at Florida Atlantic University, President Obama rolled up his sleeves and raised his voice to chastise Republicans for their spending cuts and “broken-down theories,” evoking chants of “Four more years!”

And that was the nonpolitical stop on Mr. Obama’s swing-state itinerary for that day early this month. The president sandwiched the 34-minute speech, billed as an official address on his so-called Buffett Rule for a minimum tax rate for the wealthiest Americans, amid three overtly partisan fund-raisers that accounted for the bulk of his time along the south Florida coast.

Mixing policy and politics, Mr. Obama is picking up the pace of his travel with that ultimate incumbent’s perk — unlimited use of Air Force One. The trips are mostly to about a dozen swing states that will decide the election and to two reliably Democratic states, New York and California, for campaign money…  (more)

EDITOR:   The issue isn’t really whether the President performs some official duty while traveling.  The issue is that the President must always be available both night and day to conduct official business.    How else can any president travel for personal and political purposes than by Air Force One?   The most the President should be charged is the equivalent of a coach seat for a comparable trip.

 

Share