Earnings of top 10% of households

Posted on January 1st, 2012 in News and Commentary

Earnings of top 10% of households

We find it hard to nail down accurate statistics concerning the earnings per family in the USA, especially for the top brackets. Also, we suspect that figures are understated because they are based upon tax returns rather than actual audits. Even the concept of “income” is nebulous since the increase or decrease in the value of assets is not likely measured. (To the individual household, the increase in the value of a house or stock seems like earnings while a drop seems like a loss; but this doesn’t measure on the tax return until a sale takes place.) Nevertheless, the following seems to make a good go at measurement.

Fellowship of the Minds …Conservatives who love America

  • Top 10% of households had annual gross income of $118,200 or more. (2006)
  • Top 5% of households (3/4s of whom had 2 income earners) had annual gross income of $166,200 or more.
  • Top 3% (2.67%) had annual gross income of $200,000 or more.
  • Top 1.5% had annual gross income of $250,000 or more.
  • Top 0.1% (0.12% or 146,000 households) had annual gross income of $1,600,000 or more.

The 2008 article on My Budget 360 further breaks down that Top 0.1%. At its apex are:

  • The top 0.01% (11,000 households) with annual incomes of $5.5 million or more.
  • The top 400 highest tax payers in America had annual incomes of $87 million or more.

Notice how the incomes gradually go up from the Top Third’s $65,000 to the Top 1.5%’s $250,000, but between the Top 1.5%’s $250,000 and the Top 0.1%’s $1.6 million) is a huge gap of $1.35 million!

While households in the top 1.5% of households had incomes exceeding $250,000, 443% above the national median, their incomes were still 2200% lower than those of the top 0.01% of households. One can therefore conclude that almost any household, even those with incomes of $250,000 annually are poor when compared to the top 0.1%, who in turn are poor compared to the top 0.000267%, the top 400 taxpaying households.

According to the Federal Reserve Board, here’s the distribution of U.S. households’ networths in 2001:

  • 6.9% of U.S. households had a negative networth of <$0 (i.e., those who not only have zero assets but are in debt).
  • 5.4% of households had a networth of $0-$999.
  • 2.4% of households had a networth of $1,000-$2,499.
  • 3.5% of households had a networth of $2,500-$4,999.
  • 4.7% of households had a networth of $5,000-$9,999.
  • 8.1% of households had a networth of $10,000-$24,999.
  • 9.2% of households had a networth of $25,000-$49,999.
  • 12.8% of households had a networth of $50,000-$99,999.
  • 19.2% of households had a networth of $100,000-$249,999.
  • 13% of households had a networth of $250,000-$499,999.
  • 7.8% of households had a networth of $500,000-$999,999.
  • 7% of households had a networth of $1 million or more.
Share

Leave a Reply

*

More News

Credo

"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782

Categories

Blog Archives

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

At 77, we cannot be confident that there will be ...

Convention Center Series

Convention Center Series Index

Convention Center Series Index

Chapter 1: Beginnings- Revised Chapter 2: Dream Team- Revised Chapter 3: Helping ...

Honoring those who challenged the Convention Center Project

Earlier this month, NewsLanc published “The $63.6 million convention center ...

Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics Index

Index of the ongoing series by Bill Keisling Six Decades of ...

Lancaster Acquisition of Harrisburg Incinerator

Prospects cloudy for Corbett’s Harrisburg bailout

Prospects cloudy for Corbett’s Harrisburg bailout

by Bill Keisling Corbett Administration officials publicly say the Act 47 ...

Coalition forming to challenge Corbett administration’s Harrisburg bailout plans involving LCSWMA incinerator purchase

by Bill Keisling Citizens dissatisfied with the Corbett administration's plan to ...

Tsukerman on Russia

Who really rules Russia?

Who really rules Russia?

By Slava Tsukerman Russian Internet is lately full of numerous speculations ...

Mrs. St. Petersburg, an ethnic surprise

By Slava Tsukerman One of the events most discussed on Russian ...

Memoirs

The Secrets of Outlet Shopping

The Secrets of Outlet Shopping

DAILY FINANCE: According to a recent study by Consumer Reports, ...

If you live long enough…

A great fuss was raised by Republicans during the late ...

Santa Monica Reporter

Catch these two films before they go!

Catch these two films before they go!

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter Two current films, both of ...

LGH Series

COST OF LOCAL HEALTH CARE:  Who’s right: LGH, Medicare, or the Canadians?

COST OF LOCAL HEALTH CARE: Who’s right: LGH, Medicare, or the Canadians?

Our publisher received the following statement from Medicare summarizing billings ...

LGH: First they say they will, they don’t, then they won’t

(To Tom Beeman, President, Lancaster General Health from Robert Field, ...