Is Amtrak brain dead to taxpayers’ detriment of over $1.5 billion annually?

Posted on August 3rd, 2010 in News and Commentary

Is Amtrak brain dead to taxpayers’ detriment of over $1.5 billion annually?

From the CRS Report to Congress, March 14, 2008:

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161), provided $1.325 billion in grants to Amtrak plus $30 million to the states in a new matching grant program for passenger rail-related capital improvements. For FY2009, the President is requesting $900 million for Amtrak, which is the same amount the Administration requested and $455 million less than Congress

appropriated last year. Amtrak is requesting $1.671 billion, which is $316 million more than Congress appropriated last year. Amtrak’s request does not include $114 million in ‘back pay’ for some of Amtrak’s union employees, one of the recommendations of Presidential Emergency Board 242, which was recently appointed to resolve a labor dispute.”

If Amtrak mishandling of the reconstruction of parking at their Lancaster station is an example of how they run the company, there is little surprise that they cost taxpayers over $1.5 billion in subsidies each year.

First they come up with a parking layout that is stupid beyond belief, in that it doesn’t add any parking spots for their customers.  Instead they relocated employee parking to the prime area.  Thanks to the Watchdog who raised ‘hell’ with Amtrak, their local engineers, and officials, the plans was totally revamped.

Next we learn that a couple of weeks ago Amtrak advised the County Commissioners that costs would be $2.5 million instead of the $1.7 million previously estimated.   Understand that the estimate was probably pre-recession and prices for construction have plummeted subsequently, especially as far as asphalt is concerned.  How can any enterprise be off by 50% on cost estimates after obtaining bids?

Then a visit to the train station indicates that little thought has been given to commuter parking during the construction period, with no spaces set aside for short term parking and an outlandish daily charge of $5 for the first minute.

Today we read in the Intelligencer / New Era that Amtrak has agreed to accept full responsibility for the any cost overruns.  Is this because there will be no cost over runs or because Amtrak is scared about the adverse publicity and possible investigation by authorities?

We love Amtrak.  But we loath wonton stupidity on the part of people who should know better.

Here is a bit of raw meat that conservative Congressman Joe Pitts could sink his teeth into.  He should be asking:  What the heck is going on with Amtrak?


One Comment on “Is Amtrak brain dead to taxpayers’ detriment of over $1.5 billion annually?”

  1. Anonymous

    PLEASE don’t get Joe Pitts involved. He would follow the lead of others who hold a similar philosophy and push VERY hard to have Amtrak funding eliminated permanently.

    Of course this would save taxpayers $1.5 billion up front, but would cost the public several times this amount in additional transportation costs.

Leave a Reply


More News


"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782


Blog Archives

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

NewsLanc looks back at a decade of service

At 77, we cannot be confident that there will be ...

Convention Center Series

Is Marriott Hotel’s expansion throwing good tax payer money after bad?

“The math is simple. “If the Lancaster County Convention Center ...

Will AG Kane next investigate Lancaster Convention Center ‘miracle’?

The following is excerpted from the NewsLanc Convention Center Series, ...

KEISLING: In social flip, men forced to run office for a woman in state AG’s office

It's "9 to 5," except Bruce Beemer plays Dolly Parton's ...

Lancaster Acquisition of Harrisburg Incinerator

Prospects cloudy for Corbett’s Harrisburg bailout

Prospects cloudy for Corbett’s Harrisburg bailout

by Bill Keisling Corbett Administration officials publicly say the Act 47 ...

Coalition forming to challenge Corbett administration’s Harrisburg bailout plans involving LCSWMA incinerator purchase

by Bill Keisling Citizens dissatisfied with the Corbett administration's plan to ...

Tsukerman on Russia

Truck Drivers Protest in Russia

By Slava Tsukerman [caption id="attachment_73881" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Trucks of the ...

Russian’s attitude towards ISIS

By Slava Tsukerman On Tuesday, November 17, 2015, the Russian ...


The value of apologies; the meaning of charity

Two articles in Thursday’s New York Times touched upon important ...

Should prostitution be taxed, regulated and controlled?

Perhaps in a second life, instead of being a pioneer ...

Santa Monica Reporter

“Ex Machina” and “While We’re Young:” a mechanical woman and a mechanical plot

By Daniel Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter Robots have always been prominent ...

Post Mortem on Winter; Fifty Shades of Whips, Tyrants, and a Bond parody

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter Last spring we suffered through ...

LGH Series

Does U of P Health System intend to become a health insurance company like Geisinger?

By Robert Field Lancaster General Hospital refuses to provide information to ...

LETTER: Lancaster General manipulates health care

How many people in Lancaster realize that their health care ...