Fire fighter blames City for careless negotiation with union

Posted on February 3rd, 2010 in News and Commentary

Fire fighter blames City for careless negotiation with union

The following are excerpts from a letter published on LancasterOnline.com by a firefighter who has recently been laid off.

“Throughout our negotiation process, the city did not mention, suggest, imply or otherwise indicate that any layoffs would occur. When the issue of compensation was raised, the city asked the firefighters what we were looking for. We suggested the agreed upon 3%, 3.25% and 3.5% incremental increases for the three consecutive years covered by the contract.

“The city immediately accepted this offer, with very little discussion. After that agreement, the negotiator for the city smirked and said that the city was willing to offer 4 or 5%. We joked with the city about making a low offer and moved on under the belief that both parties were satisfied…

“Our fire bureau is already critically understaffed. For example, I, as a probationary firefighter with about 6 months in service was pressed into service as a driver/operator for several fire apparatus due to a lack of available staff…

“Training is also a problem. Only the most senior firefighters on the job today can remember the last time city firefighters were able to train using live fire in a “burn building.” …

  • Share/Bookmark

One Comment on “Fire fighter blames City for careless negotiation with union”

  1. Anonymous

    How sad this city, county, state and country is operating on POLITICS over doing the job. Forget the party one is affiliated with, it is all about what is in it for ME. I see this every day and am disgusted at government waste as the taxpayers suffer from tax increases.

    Government unions and educational unions are strangling every city, municipality, county and state. Until everyone comes to the conclusion that instead of spending and what is in it for the individual, we will continue to bleed to death and be tax poor.

    As long as there is not fire where lives are lost due to inadequate safety provided, business will go on as usual.

    The city can find 130,000 for a study on the trolley system and the county can give 20,000 to pay the 150,000 but there is no money for safety.

Leave a Reply

More News

Credo

"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782

Blog Archives

Categories

LGH Series

How US Health Care stacks up Against Others

How US Health Care stacks up Against Others

The World Health Organization ranked health care quality by countries.  ...

Taxation without representation is…LGH

“In economics, a monopoly exists when a specific individual or ...

Convention Center Series

An Authority unchecked and unchallenged

An Authority unchecked and unchallenged

Forty-fifth in a series by Christiaan Hart-Nibbrig “These municipal authorities are ...

Time line for LCCCA Project

Forty-fourth in a series by Christiaan A. Hart Nibbrig The Lancaster ...

Santa Monica Reporter

The Kids Are All Right, and Schmucks

The Kids Are All Right, and Schmucks

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter The mediocre performance of several ...

The conception of Inception

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter Although it aspires to more, ...