EDITORIAL: New Era rail yard article shameless

Posted on December 30th, 2008 in News and Commentary

A Dec. 30 lead story is headlined “Rail move set to go, but legal battle looming.
F&M says work to begin mid-January. Opponents eye injunction to stop it.”

The article mentions neighbors concerns about the release of friable asbestos upon the excavation of the dump, but then uncritically publishes F&M’s response.

It is only in the last two paragraph that the article addresses the other major TRRAAC issue: Alternative locations have not been properly evaluated. (In a report several weeks ago, the New Era didn’t even mention the location issue.)

We note the artful phrasing:

“F&M’s Web site also addresses the two alternative sites proposed by TRRAAC that would move the relocated rail yard farther east, away from residential areas.

“Those sites, the Web site says, ‘were considered even before TRRAAC came into existence, and both sites were rejected because they failed to meet the important design criteria … and project goals.’”

They cite “F&M’s Web site”. What about TRRAAC’s web site that discusses the matter in detail and at length?

As a feeble excuse, the article says “TRRAAC’s president, Dan Gillis, and other TRRAAC officials were out of town for the holidays and unavailable for comment this morning.”

TRRAAC has posted on its web site and sent out press releases stating its concerns about the choice of this location rather than others. The Sunday News has published a column by TRRAAC setting forth its concerns. TRRAAC hardly needs F&M’s public relations representatives to speak for them!

We believe that F&M and LGH are and have been unwilling to allow a nuetral third party evaluation of the merits of relocation to other potential sites. Hopefully either the courts or a government agency will step in to correct the matter, or LGH will re-evaluate its blind support of F & M’s president John Fry and order an independent evaluation.

It is newspaper propaganda like this on behalf of F&M and LGH, fellow members of the Big Five as is the Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., that confounds and alienates many subscribers and advertisers.

Leave a Reply

More News

Credo

"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782

Blog Archives

Categories

LGH Series

How US Health Care stacks up Against Others

How US Health Care stacks up Against Others

The World Health Organization ranked health care quality by countries.  ...

Nine top LGH executives averaged 50% pay increases in 2008

Second in a series concerning LGH’s 2008 Federal 990 Report In ...

Convention Center Series

January thru June 2006 TimeLine

January thru June 2006 TimeLine

Forty-third in a series by Christiaan Hart-Nibbrig Editor’s note:  The following ...

The Fog of War, Part I

Forty-second in a series by Christiaan Hart-Nibbrig “We – I – ...

Santa Monica Reporter

A human Secret and an inhuman Splice

A human Secret and an inhuman Splice

By Daniel Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter “The Secret in Their Eyes,” ...

Shoot Out in the Art House

By Santa Monica Reporter, Dan Cohen Theaters like Landmark's Ritz in ...