EDITORIAL: New Era rail yard article shameless

Posted on December 30th, 2008 in News and Commentary

A Dec. 30 lead story is headlined “Rail move set to go, but legal battle looming.
F&M says work to begin mid-January. Opponents eye injunction to stop it.”

The article mentions neighbors concerns about the release of friable asbestos upon the excavation of the dump, but then uncritically publishes F&M’s response.

It is only in the last two paragraph that the article addresses the other major TRRAAC issue: Alternative locations have not been properly evaluated. (In a report several weeks ago, the New Era didn’t even mention the location issue.)

We note the artful phrasing:

“F&M’s Web site also addresses the two alternative sites proposed by TRRAAC that would move the relocated rail yard farther east, away from residential areas.

“Those sites, the Web site says, ‘were considered even before TRRAAC came into existence, and both sites were rejected because they failed to meet the important design criteria … and project goals.’”

They cite “F&M’s Web site”. What about TRRAAC’s web site that discusses the matter in detail and at length?

As a feeble excuse, the article says “TRRAAC’s president, Dan Gillis, and other TRRAAC officials were out of town for the holidays and unavailable for comment this morning.”

TRRAAC has posted on its web site and sent out press releases stating its concerns about the choice of this location rather than others. The Sunday News has published a column by TRRAAC setting forth its concerns. TRRAAC hardly needs F&M’s public relations representatives to speak for them!

We believe that F&M and LGH are and have been unwilling to allow a nuetral third party evaluation of the merits of relocation to other potential sites. Hopefully either the courts or a government agency will step in to correct the matter, or LGH will re-evaluate its blind support of F & M’s president John Fry and order an independent evaluation.

It is newspaper propaganda like this on behalf of F&M and LGH, fellow members of the Big Five as is the Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., that confounds and alienates many subscribers and advertisers.

Share

Leave a Reply

*

More News

Credo

"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782

Blog Archives

Categories

Convention Center Series

Convention Center Series Index

Convention Center Series Index

Prologue Chapter One: Genesis Chapter Two: The Dream Team: Penn Square Partners Chapter ...

Convention Center Authority calls for increase in Hotel Room Sales Tax

Kevin R. Molloy, the executive director of the Lancaster County ...

Santa Monica Reporter

HOLIDAY DISAPPOINTMENTS: “Holmes,” “Hugo,” and “Young Adult”

HOLIDAY DISAPPOINTMENTS: “Holmes,” “Hugo,” and “Young Adult”

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica Reporter "GAMES OF SHADOWS" Any resemblance between ...

Women in jeopardy: three very different thrillers

By Dan Cohen, Santa Monica reporter “The Skin I Live In” When ...

Memoirs

Observations at the top of “Things to do” list

Observations at the top of “Things to do” list

“To be and not to do is not to be ...

Birth rate plummets in Brazil

From the WASHINGTON POST: Fertility rates have dropped in many parts ...

LGH Series

From ‘Soak The Rich’ To ‘Soak The Poor’: Recent Trends In Hospital Pricing

From ‘Soak The Rich’ To ‘Soak The Poor’: Recent Trends In Hospital Pricing

From HEALTH AFFAIRS: FIFTY YEARS AGO the poor and uninsured ...

How Doctors Could Rescue Health Care

By Arnold S. Relman, MD * From THE NEW YORK REVIEW: ...

Penn State/Sandusky

Timeline: Penn State / Sandusky / Corbett

Timeline: Penn State / Sandusky / Corbett

By Bill Keisling Editor's note: Associates of Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett ...