Lancaster should junk voting machines without verifiable paper trail

Posted on April 25th, 2008 in News and Commentary

The following is excerpted from www.blackboxvoting.org:

The entire premise of technology-based elections is based on support for the “verifiable voting” concept. But before designing technology for elections, we must first determine how it will empower citizen controls, enabling the counting of votes in public rather than counting them in secret. We do not consent to any form of secret vote counting, administered and controlled by government insiders and their vendors.

Any system that forces the citizenry to trust government insiders to count their votes represents a change in the original design of this nation. The United States of America was designed to uphold the right of citizen sovereignty over the government. In addition to hiding the counting of votes from public view, computer-counted elections hide the chain of custody of the vote data. Citizens are never allowed to view the original input in order to compare it to the output, and are relegated to trusting circumstantial evidence controlled by insiders. Such a system is, in fact, a transfer of power…

The core of elections was and again must return to the principle of citizen sovereignty over government. Elections can never be based on a requirement to trust government insiders and their vendors to count our votes, nor can elections be dependent on experts to tell the citizenry that the system is okay, nor should the detailed mechanics of elections be impossible for the average citizen to understand. Models which depend on experts and insiders create centralized control, and remove all control from government’s rightful owners – the citizens. This represents a violation of the principles laid out in the Declaration of Independence.

Share

Leave a Reply

*

More News

Credo

"....I have never made it a consideration whether the subject was popular or unpopular, but whether it was right or wrong; for that which is right will become popular, and that which is wrong, though by mistake it may obtain the cry or fashion of the day, will soon lose the power of delusion, and sink into disesteem." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, on "Financing the War", March 5, 1782

Blog Archives

Categories

Convention Center Series

Convention Center Series Index

Convention Center Series Index

Prologue Chapter One: Genesis Chapter Two: The Dream Team: Penn Square Partners Chapter ...

What the Convention Center CSL Report really said

The "Conventions, Sports & Leisure” (CSL) Report is largely a ...

Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics

Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics Index

Keisling on Pennsylvania Politics Index

Index of the ongoing series by Bill Keisling Harrisburg Watershed Series Part ...

Harrisburg Incinerator Forensic Report deal with last desperate attempt – Part Six of the Watershed Series

A series by Bill Keisling The Harrisburg Authority's forensic audit of ...

Santa Monica Reporter

Santa Monica reporter comments on Academy Awards

Santa Monica reporter comments on Academy Awards

I thought the show was one of the best in ...

Oscar Hangover: Part 2

By Dan Cohen, NewsLanc’s Santa Monica Reporter Last time I talked about ...

Memoirs

Face Blindness: ‘60 Minutes’ Spotlights Rare Condition Of Prosopagnosia

Face Blindness: ‘60 Minutes’ Spotlights Rare Condition Of Prosopagnosia

HUFFINGTON POST: it like not to recognize your best friend's ...

A seventy-fifth birthday wish

By Robert Edwin Field Over dinner earlier in the week, a ...

LGH Series

Sunday News:  “LGH surplus down, but healthy at $63.2 million”

Sunday News: “LGH surplus down, but healthy at $63.2 million”

Lancaster General Health has  published its annual 990 federal financial ...